This was so simple even I could do it. No math just pick some values to limit the current and set the bias. I'm looking at about 1 ma current draw.
I mv in 500 mv out. 1 mv will rattle my earbud 1 volt is loud enough with my ceramic head phone.
The frequency response is well beyond my hearing range. I put it on a bread board and put a diode, coil and antenna on the input. It plays my local station.
I made this circuit using 2SK669's before and it was a good build also.
Friday, June 29, 2018
Thursday, June 28, 2018
lacing a parallel cable run
Usually when we lace a bundle we just wrap the string around the wires but what if we want the wires to lay flat?
I bent a hook in the end of a piece of wire to make it easier to feed the ribbon through
Lay the ribbon on the cables with a long enough tag to tie it off when finished.
Take the ribbon under and over to the first gap between wires.
Wrap under the main tag and back up then down through the second gap.
Wrap the tag and back up.
Keep spiraling down - over - up and down the next gap until you reach the far side.
Now bring the first tag under and up the right side. Tie the ends off and trim the ribbon.
Repeat at the other points needing tying.
If you use dental floss you can get a needle with a big eye and sew the wires in place. Using a needle will aid in separating the wire too. If they get a twist you can put the needle between them and iron the twist out by running it down the wire run.
Lay the ribbon on the cables with a long enough tag to tie it off when finished.
Wrap under the main tag and back up then down through the second gap.
Wrap the tag and back up.
Keep spiraling down - over - up and down the next gap until you reach the far side.
Now bring the first tag under and up the right side. Tie the ends off and trim the ribbon.
Repeat at the other points needing tying.
If you use dental floss you can get a needle with a big eye and sew the wires in place. Using a needle will aid in separating the wire too. If they get a twist you can put the needle between them and iron the twist out by running it down the wire run.
Sunday, June 24, 2018
A MW RF amp using the data from the previous post
500KHz to 1500KHz
Expanded range to show more roll-off
The yellow is the half power points. The red is the MW band.
Increased range to show roll-off.
Different transistor. You can try others to see which are useful in the desired application.
Expanded range to show more roll-off
The yellow is the half power points. The red is the MW band.
Increased range to show roll-off.
Different transistor. You can try others to see which are useful in the desired application.
Saturday, June 23, 2018
amp input characteristic vs bandwidth
Reducing the input capacitance to 10p raises the high end to 30 MHz. What determines this value? The transistor inter-electrode capacitance, Beta, and strays. How would we reduce it?
Raising the input Z made the response worse.
Reducing the coupling cap value and the input cap gives a better high end response.
So the question becomes how can the designer control the circuit reactance? Maybe the question is how to work with what he has to get max benefit?
So build the circuit in SPICE and try different values. Look at the transistor datasheet and see what your real world values will be. Above all else have fun.
high-low corner and frequency response
The half power point is .707 signal out or when Xc = Rl in a RC coupled circuit. I will show some RC circuits and some transistor amps to examine.
50 Ohm response rolls off below 90MHz
Changing the caps shifted it slightly above 50 Mhz
You can see the RC circuit response is predictable but adding a transistor will cause the curve to shift. The transistor parameters come into play and must be accounted for. Some things are beyond the designers control. So we need to use the manufactures data sheet to see if out transistor will serve our purpose.
It's a simple circuit you can type into SPICE is a minute or two but playing with it can reveal a lot about how the coupling system responds.
50 Ohm response rolls off below 90MHz
Looking at the low corner. |
Here I have 10 mv in and 5 mv out |
My 2N3904 roll off is less than 50 MHz |
Changing the caps shifted it slightly above 50 Mhz
usiong 50 Ohm I/O |
600 in 50 out |
50 in 600 out |
600 in 50 out and smaller cap |
50 in 50 out and small cap. observe the scaling. |
You can see the RC circuit response is predictable but adding a transistor will cause the curve to shift. The transistor parameters come into play and must be accounted for. Some things are beyond the designers control. So we need to use the manufactures data sheet to see if out transistor will serve our purpose.
It's a simple circuit you can type into SPICE is a minute or two but playing with it can reveal a lot about how the coupling system responds.
Tuesday, June 12, 2018
The Miller effect and more
The scans are not the greatest but maybe you can read them. The inter-electrode capacitance and stray capacitance are the enemy. And then comes the Miller Effect.
I will post a link to a good book with this information in it if I can find one.
The half power point is where Xco = Rl. Increases C causes Xc to decrease. Adding parallel capacitance causes C to increase. Stray capacitance and inter element capacitance are at play.
I will post a link to a good book with this information in it if I can find one.
The half power point is where Xco = Rl. Increases C causes Xc to decrease. Adding parallel capacitance causes C to increase. Stray capacitance and inter element capacitance are at play.
Monday, June 11, 2018
Large signal or small signal detection
If you amplify an AM signal with a non-linear amp it will demodulate the signal. Some AM detectors operate in the non linear region and are square law or small signal detectors.
If you rectify an AM signal it will be detected. A detector operating in this region is a large signal or linear detector.
A simple crystal detector is a small signal detector and operates square law. This is not an advantage it is just the way it is. As the signal increases the output increases at a faster rate because of the non linear detector but it is still weak.
A receiver with an RF amplifier will boost the signal to the point it operates large scale or linear. It will have a higher output because it was amplified not because of the detector operation.
This is a simple explanation of how a detector works. Nothing wrong here unless we assume it is a crystal set operating square law. The signal is rectified. In order to be rectified it must be strong enough to over come the knee of the diode. What is the knee? It is sometimes called the bend. What it is in a solid state diode is the voltage required to overcome the built-in potential. The semiconductor doping causes barriers in the structure which must be overcome. The easiest way to define the knee or bend is that point where the slope of the curve equals 45 degrees. Bend detection was used in tubes too.
Square law, weak signal plate detector.
Linear,strong signal plate detector.
If you build an amp attach an antenna to the input and hear audio on the output you have a non linear amp or you or over driving it.
non linear = square law detector
over driving = linear detector.
If you connect the antenna and hear AC it is just line noise. When adding a diode across the input produces audio it is high gain enough to trace signals in a radio and linear enough to give valid test.
If your amp passes these test it is ready to serve as a signal tracer.
If you rectify an AM signal it will be detected. A detector operating in this region is a large signal or linear detector.
A simple crystal detector is a small signal detector and operates square law. This is not an advantage it is just the way it is. As the signal increases the output increases at a faster rate because of the non linear detector but it is still weak.
A receiver with an RF amplifier will boost the signal to the point it operates large scale or linear. It will have a higher output because it was amplified not because of the detector operation.
This is a simple explanation of how a detector works. Nothing wrong here unless we assume it is a crystal set operating square law. The signal is rectified. In order to be rectified it must be strong enough to over come the knee of the diode. What is the knee? It is sometimes called the bend. What it is in a solid state diode is the voltage required to overcome the built-in potential. The semiconductor doping causes barriers in the structure which must be overcome. The easiest way to define the knee or bend is that point where the slope of the curve equals 45 degrees. Bend detection was used in tubes too.
Square law, weak signal plate detector.
Linear,strong signal plate detector.
If you build an amp attach an antenna to the input and hear audio on the output you have a non linear amp or you or over driving it.
non linear = square law detector
over driving = linear detector.
If you connect the antenna and hear AC it is just line noise. When adding a diode across the input produces audio it is high gain enough to trace signals in a radio and linear enough to give valid test.
If your amp passes these test it is ready to serve as a signal tracer.
signal tracing as a troubleshooting technique
Looking through the Health manual will tell more than I can in just a few words. The simple AF amp with a probe can be a good addition to a test bench. Especially for the bottom feeder without deep pockets.
signal tracer
This looks like the one I had as a kid. Notice it had a RF and AF input. The amp was strong enough I could clip an antenna to the RF input and receive our local station.
So you can build a high gain AF amp and a RF probe and be in business. The probe would be like this one.
This one is designed to be used with a voltmeter to read RF signals. A search will find more this is the idea. C1 would be small enough to block AF and large enough to pass RF.
Now how would you use it?
If you made this radio and it failed to produce output you could check the speaker with the AF probe. If you hear signal the speaker is bad otherwise check the input to the power amp. If you hear signal the power amp is bad otherwise check the input to the AF amp. If you hear signal the AF amp is bad otherwise attach the RF probe and check the detector input. If you have signal the detector is bad. Etc...
If you started at the first RF amp input and had signal and moved to its output you would expect to hear a louder signal. As you progress through you would be turning the volume down to a good listening level and expecting and increase. When you step over a stage and the signal drops you have found the problem area. Then you troubleshoot that stage......
Here they show the signals you would find in a superhet receiver. You just need to know when to look for AF or RF and use the correct probe.
So build an amp and probe and you are set to troubleshoot radios.
signal tracer
So you can build a high gain AF amp and a RF probe and be in business. The probe would be like this one.
Now how would you use it?
If you made this radio and it failed to produce output you could check the speaker with the AF probe. If you hear signal the speaker is bad otherwise check the input to the power amp. If you hear signal the power amp is bad otherwise check the input to the AF amp. If you hear signal the AF amp is bad otherwise attach the RF probe and check the detector input. If you have signal the detector is bad. Etc...
If you started at the first RF amp input and had signal and moved to its output you would expect to hear a louder signal. As you progress through you would be turning the volume down to a good listening level and expecting and increase. When you step over a stage and the signal drops you have found the problem area. Then you troubleshoot that stage......
Here they show the signals you would find in a superhet receiver. You just need to know when to look for AF or RF and use the correct probe.
So build an amp and probe and you are set to troubleshoot radios.
What difference can the transistor make?
I built the circuit in the simulator and the changed the transistor.
The J112 is a good low frequency transistor but not so good at 100 MHz. It is a 5 cent part so a second stage could be used to pick up the gain.
The 2N3819 is another good low frequency amp. All but a total failure here though.
The good news and the bad news (for me). The best performer is a surface mount. For the difference in performance it is worth a little mounting issue. The good news is Arrow sells a 3K reel for $15 with free shipping.
This was an exercise in making the cascode amp. I would use a BF998 or BF2040w when available. Sadly they are both reaching end of life. Last time I checked Arrow still had some but when they are gone they are gone.
The simple approach used in the above circuit was to set the bias on J2 at 1 volt and the bias on J1 at 4 volts. I wanted about 1 ma current so I adjusted the other resistors to suit.
The J112 is a good low frequency transistor but not so good at 100 MHz. It is a 5 cent part so a second stage could be used to pick up the gain.
The 2N3819 is another good low frequency amp. All but a total failure here though.
The good news and the bad news (for me). The best performer is a surface mount. For the difference in performance it is worth a little mounting issue. The good news is Arrow sells a 3K reel for $15 with free shipping.
This was an exercise in making the cascode amp. I would use a BF998 or BF2040w when available. Sadly they are both reaching end of life. Last time I checked Arrow still had some but when they are gone they are gone.
The simple approach used in the above circuit was to set the bias on J2 at 1 volt and the bias on J1 at 4 volts. I wanted about 1 ma current so I adjusted the other resistors to suit.
Sunday, June 10, 2018
118.5MHz amp Playing with the designer and simulator
In my previous post I offered some programs to help with the design. I will do a couple of quick and dirty examples. Using transistor amp.
You open the program and click new amp and select the type. Just fill in the blanks. Select the transistor from the list and select the resistor series. For low frequency amps I would use E12. You can get an E12 kit at a reasonable price and get by with low frequency amps. For a high frequency amp the part values become more critical so I go with the E96 series for our high frequency amp. Click ok.
That's all there is to it, until we start Z matching. I set Zin and Zout to 50k for the example. Note the odd value resistors, 49900, 11800 and 162. That's the E96 series values. You can run the sim and change the values to see how critical they are.
With the Zin and Zout at 2k the values are a lot different. I would go with this one over the first because it will be harder to over load. Remember a low Z feeding a high Z will not load up. A high Z feeding a low Z will load up. With less than 2 ma it doesn't cost much.
I did a simple circuit to see the difference. This circuit would be more temperature sensitive. It is still the one I go with more often than not
I 'built' the circuit in the simulator. 1 mv in 80 mv out is not bad?
I put in a second stage to see how it worked. 1 mv to 800 mv?
If you build this circuit in sim change the values of L1 and L2 to see their effect.
You open the program and click new amp and select the type. Just fill in the blanks. Select the transistor from the list and select the resistor series. For low frequency amps I would use E12. You can get an E12 kit at a reasonable price and get by with low frequency amps. For a high frequency amp the part values become more critical so I go with the E96 series for our high frequency amp. Click ok.
That's all there is to it, until we start Z matching. I set Zin and Zout to 50k for the example. Note the odd value resistors, 49900, 11800 and 162. That's the E96 series values. You can run the sim and change the values to see how critical they are.
With the Zin and Zout at 2k the values are a lot different. I would go with this one over the first because it will be harder to over load. Remember a low Z feeding a high Z will not load up. A high Z feeding a low Z will load up. With less than 2 ma it doesn't cost much.
I did a simple circuit to see the difference. This circuit would be more temperature sensitive. It is still the one I go with more often than not
I 'built' the circuit in the simulator. 1 mv in 80 mv out is not bad?
If you build this circuit in sim change the values of L1 and L2 to see their effect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)