Oddly when the Ebers-Moll enters the discussion it is with no explanation and is just to impress the readers so let us look at the model.
Ebers-Moll sees the transistor as 2 diodes connected back to back. One is forward biased and one is reversed biased. Would this model represent a real world transistor? Let us look at a couple of them.
This example is 2 diodes sharing the base connection. They are made with the same doping so would be represented by the model quite well. (the exception being the common connection rather than 2 cathodes.) This would be an early transistor such as found in the old books.
A later transistor is the epitaxial shown here. This time we see n- , n+ and p-. What they tell us is the doping levels are not the same. + is heavy doping while - is lightly doped. The 2N2222 is a planar epitaxial transistor so I will use it for the test. (The 2N2222 is the negistor I used in my simple oscillator.)
I adjusted the bias and now have the gain of 60 with the transistor installed properly. Why did I need to adjust the bias? Remember the p+ and n-? The doping is so a small base emitter current can control a larger emitter collector current. The heavily doped emitter injects carriers more efficiently.
Some food for thought,eh?
EDIT: I should point out the power handling ability of the transistor will need to be watched if using the circuit. The question would be ,'what is the base current?' Using a higher base current could burn the base out. It might be worth a test board.
EDIT 2: I think a 2N5550 will work backwards too.
Another circuit to test.
Hi, I'm building a guitar pedal using a Germanium AC125 transistor. When I properly orient the transistor, there is no gain, but when I put it in backwards, I get a nice slightly distorted gain tone! Is is okay to just use it "backwards"? Will this cause the transistor to eventually fail? How can I get it to work properly oriented? Should I increase R1?
ReplyDeleteThanks